Elecciones generales Estados Unidos 2020: Donald Trump vs Joe Biden

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

El Senado de EE.UU. confirma la constitucionalidad del juicio político contra Donald Trump​

Trump se enfrenta a su segundo 'impeachment', siendo el primer presidente de EE.UU. en ser sometido a este procedimiento dos veces durante un mandato.

Este 9 de febrero, el Senado de EE.UU. ha celebrado una votación en cuyo marco confirmó la constitucionalidad del juicio político contra el expresidente Donald Trump por "incitación a la insurrección", tras los incidentes ocurridos el pasado 6 de enero durante el asalto al Capitolio, mientras se ratificaba la victoria de Joe Biden.

Los fiscales en el juicio político de la Cámara de Representantes (los llamados 'gerentes de juicio político') debatieron este martes con los abogados de Trump, David Schoen y Bruce Castor, si el proceso se corresponde con la Constitución, teniendo en cuenta que Trump ya no ocupa el cargo.

56 senadores, entre ellos 6 miembros del Partido Republicano, votaron a favor de la legitimidad del juicio, mientras 44 se expresaron en contra.

El miércoles las partes comenzarán a presentar su caso y ambas tendrán 16 horas durante cuatro días para hacerlo. Se prevé que en total el juicio dure no más de una semana.

Trump se enfrenta a su segundo 'impeachment', siendo el primer presidente de EE.UU. en ser sometido a este procedimiento dos veces durante un mandato.

La Cámara de Representantes de EE.UU. aprobó el juicio político a Trump el 13 de enero. La iniciativa fue apoyada por 232 miembros de la Cámara, mientras que 197 mostraron su rechazo. De los votos a favor del 'impeachment', 10 fueron de miembros del Partido Republicano, lo que supone un número récord de congresistas que votaron contra un presidente de su propio partido.

El Senado de EE.UU. confirma la constitucionalidad del juicio político contra Donald Trump

Trump se enfrenta a su segundo 'impeachment', siendo el primer presidente de EE.UU. en ser sometido a este procedimiento dos veces durante un mandato.

actualidad.rt.com

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

Jeffrey Lord Read Through the Democrats’ 77 Page Impeachment Paper and Identified 75 Lies​

Jeffrey Lord, a contributing editor to The American Spectator, is a former aide to Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp. Lord is also an author, former CNN commentator and staunch Trump supporter. On Tuesday he listed the many lies embedded within the Democrats’ unprecedented impeachment trial.

The Trump War Room retweeted Lord’s list of Democrat lies related to this impeachment:




Lord says that he read the 77-page report provided by the Democrats to support their spontaneous impeachment of President Trump. He then attempted to identify and list the numerous lies within the document. He came up with 75 lies. Here is a list of his first 10:

Lie # 1: The very first sentence reads: “This trial arises from President Donald J. Trump’s incitement of insurrection against the Republic he swore to protect.”

Fact: President Trump did no such thing. I had a front-row seat at his speech on the White House Ellipse. I listened to every word. (Here is the text if you want to read for yourself. Donald Trump Speech "Save America" Rally Transcript January 6 - Rev ) The President recounted his views of what had happened in different states when it came to running the elections in their state. Then he said this: “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

There was nothing – nothing – said to cause “an incitement of insurrection”. That is a lie.

Lie # 2: The charge says: “In a grievous betrayal of his Oath of Office, President Trump incited a violent mob to attack the United States Capitol during the Joint Session, thus impeding Congress’s confirmation of Joseph R. Biden, Jr. as the winner of the presidential election.”

Fact: As stated above, Trump did no such thing. Saying “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” is hardly a “grievous betrayal” of the presidential oath of office. That is a lie.

Lie # 3: “He spent months asserting, without evidence, that he won in a ‘landslide’ and that the election was ‘stolen.’”

Fact: Donald Trump produced volumes of evidence of a stolen election. There were state legislative hearings at which one person after another came forward, under oath, to testify to the evidence they had personally witnessed. Over there at David Horowitz’s Front Page is a detailed account of the evidence. The headline: “Yes, It Was a Stolen Election: You’d have to be blind not to see it.” This sentence in the impeachment charge is another lie.

Lie # 4: Here’s what the impeachment charges say about the crowd that gathered behind the White House Ellipse to hear the President and others speak: “The crowd was armed, angry and dangerous.”

Fact: I was there. In the front row. There was rock music being played. People all around me were dancing. Laughing. I have the video that I took. To say otherwise is a lie.

Lie #5: The crowd in front of the President was “tense.”

Fact: As said, a provable lie. I have the video.

Lie # 6: The charge: “Then he aimed them straight at the Capitol, declaring: “You’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”

Fact: Left out – again and deliberately – the President’s call to “to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” In short, no matter how many times this lie is repeated it is still a lie.

Lie # 7: The President is accused of a “failure to take charge of a decisive security response.”

Fact: The President of the United States has no authority over security at the U.S. Capitol. Those who do: The House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, House and Senate committees and The Architect of the Capitol.
Another lie.

Lie # 8: “It is impossible to imagine the events of January 6 occurring without President Trump creating a powder keg, striking a match and then seeking personal advantage from the ensuing havoc.”

Fact: Speaking out using First Amendment rights of free speech to demand an honest election investigation is not “creating a powder keg.” Silencing dissent is what creates a powder keg. This is another lie.

Lie # 9: “In the words of Representative Liz Cheney, the House Republican Conference Chair: ‘The President of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack. Everything that followed was his doing. None of this would have happened without the President. The President could have immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence. He did not. There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and and his oath to the Constitution.’ Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell recently affirmed that ‘the mob was fed lies’ and ‘provoked by the president.’”

Fact: Just because Cheney and McConnell are Republicans does not make what they said true. The President summoned no “mob.” That is a lie. He invited his supporters – Americans one and all – to “peacefully and patriotically” exercise their First Amendment “right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” He was 100% within his right to do so, and the thousands who peacefully attended were 100% within their right to do so. And no, the President fed the peaceful attendees no lies. To radically change what actually happened to these kind of descriptions is turning the truth into a lie.

In fact, as the New York Post has reported of former Fox anchor Megyn Kelly: “Megyn Kelly argued CNN and other media outlets partially share responsibility for the Jan. 6 deadly riot at the US Capitol — claiming the public ‘lost trust’ in what she characterized as a lack of objective reporting of former President Trump.”

Lie #10: The impeachment charge says: “This is not a partisan matter.”

Fact: That is a particularly bold lie. Utterly laughable. This impeachment, like the one that preceded it, is nothing but partisan.

See the remaining 65 lies on his list here.

The Democrats and every person who aided and abetted in the 2020 election fraud should be indicted and put in jail for a very long time if not addressed under the acts of treason. This was arguably the greatest crime in world history. Instead our very corrupt and evil media is covering it up by not reporting it. Big Tech is censoring those who report on the crime and the FBI and DOJ are refusing to do the jobs they are sworn to do and are doing nothing.

All these people should be in jail or addressed according to the relevant crimes they are committing. Americans have not forgotten and are totally enraged with what is going on.

Jeffrey Lord Read Through the Democrats' 77 Page Impeachment Paper and Identified 75 Lies | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Jeffrey Lord, a contributing editor to The American Spectator, is a former aide to Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Estigal]

La votación para autorizar el juicio indica que el Senado absolverá a Trump​

Cuarenta y cuatro republicanos votaron en contra de seguir adelante con el juicio contra el expresidente Donald Trump, la señal más clara hasta ahora de que el Senado acabará absolviendo al presidente de la acusación que pesa sobre él por segunda vez.

Tres senadores republicanos señalaron el martes que la votación es un barómetro de cuántos senadores votarán para absolver al presidente cuando el juicio termine.

“Tengo que creer que va a ser muy improbable que haya los suficientes para condenar[lo]”, dijo el senador Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), según The Hill. “Hace falta algo de gimnasia mental para, por un lado, considerar que se trata de una acción inconstitucional y, por otro, considerar que la condena es parte de ella”.

El senador Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) dijo que estaría “muy sorprendido” si algún republicano cambiara de opinión durante el juicio.

“Si uno siente que no tiene autoridad, entonces no puede seguir y decir ‘bueno, no tenemos autoridad pero supongo que seguiré adelante y condenaré de todos modos'”, dijo Hawley, según The Hill. “Me sorprendería que muchas o alguna de esas personas cambiaran de opinión sobre la cuestión de fondo de oponerse o no a una pena”.

El senador Mike Braun (R-Ind.) dijo que la votación del martes era un indicador del resultado final.

“Creo que al igual que lo fue la de hace un par de semanas”, dijo Braun, según The Hill.

El voto del martes es un reflejo del emitido el mes pasado, cuando 45 republicanos votaron a favor de declarar el juicio inconstitucional.

Los demócratas de la Cámara de Representantes, a los que se unieron 10 republicanos, votaron el 13 de enero a favor de la destitución de Trump por un único cargo de incitación a la insurrección, alegando que el presidente dirigió la turba que irrumpió en el Capitolio el 6 de enero.

Trump niega los cargos. En un discurso pronunciado el día del asalto al Capitolio, el presidente dijo a sus partidarios que hicieran oír su voz “pacífica y patrióticamente”.

“Voy a votar como voté el otro día durante el juicio. No creo que sea constitucional, no creo que debamos hacerlo”, dijo el senador Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), según The Hill.

Los encargados del impeachment y los abogados de Trump pasaron aproximadamente cuatro horas el martes tratando de persuadir a los senadores sobre la constitucionalidad del juicio. El argumento central de los encargados del impeachment planteaba que si el Senado no podía juzgar a un expresidente, entonces los presidentes tendrían la llamada “excepción de enero” para cometer ofensas impugnables durante sus últimos días en el cargo sabiendo que no podrían ser juzgados. Los abogados defensores calificaron esa idea de “disparate”.

“Si mis colegas de este lado de la cámara realmente piensan que el presidente Trump cometió un delito penal (…) después de que termine su mandato, van y lo arrestan. Así que no hay ninguna oportunidad en la que el presidente de los Estados Unidos pueda desbocarse en enero al final de su mandato y salir impune. El Departamento de Justicia sí sabe qué hacer con esa gente”, dijo el abogado de Trump, Bruce Castor. Fuente: The Epoch Times en español

La votación para autorizar el juicio indica que el Senado absolverá a Trump | Donald Trump | impeachment | The Epoch Times en español

Cuarenta y cuatro republicanos votaron en contra de seguir adelante con el juicio contra el expresidente Donald Trump, la señal más clara hasta ahora de que el Senado acabará absolviendo ...

es.theepochtimes.com

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]

HUGE DEVELOPMENT: Hand Recount Finds Dominion Owned Voting Machines Shorted EVERY REPUBLICAN Candidate in Windham, New Hampshire, 300 Votes!​

Here we go.
More proof of election fraud by Dominion Voting Machines.

A recent hand recount in the Rockingham District 7 NH House Race in Windham, New Hampshire, found that the Dominion voting machines shorted EVERY REPUBLICAN by roughly 300 votes.

Via Facebook

The Dominion machine counted results were wrong for all 4 Republicans by almost exactly 300 votes.

Granite Grok reported:

The Town of Windham used Dominion machines to count paper ballots and upon a believable hand recount, it was confirmed each Republican was machine-cheated out of roughly 300 votes.

You would think this would have been solved by the Dominion machine company, the Secretary of State, the Elections Unit of the AG’s Office, or the laughable Ballot Law Commission. (Kathy Sullivan, d (Term expires July 1, 2024)

Nope.

Just like every other state that used machines that alter ballot counts in favor of one political party over another – here we are.

Dominion Voting Systems owns the intellectual property of the AccuVote machines used in New Hampshire.

Patch.com reported:

In New Hampshire, he noted, the AccuVote optical scanners used in all communities that have voting machines are an “older technology” and each moderator uses the device’s results tape, at the end of the night, to reveal the results, on a paper “Return of Votes” form. AccuVote devices have been used for more than a quarter of a century in the state and are the only devices approved by the Ballot Law Commission.

“The device was originally manufactured by Unisys, then by Global Elections Systems Inc., which are no longer in business,” Yen said. “The device used in New Hampshire is no longer being manufactured. Dominion (Voting Systems) owns the intellectual property of the AccuVote and its related election management system but does not manufacture the device.”

HUGE DEVELOPMENT: Hand Recount Finds Dominion Owned Voting Machines Shorted EVERY REPUBLICAN Candidate in Windham, New Hampshire, 300 Votes! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Here we go.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Estigal]

All of China Joe’s Actions to Date With China – Help China and Hurt America​

Day after day Joe Biden is doing more and more to support China. In fact, he has done more to help China than help the United States.

We know why the corrupt Biden clan is so close to China, it’s because they made a lot of money with China:

The Whole Biden Family Made Money with Chinese Deals - Hunter Biden Still Has Business in China | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Hunter Biden wouldn’t have a dime if his dad wasn’t a corrupt politician.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

As we all knew the Biden’s would continue and even ramp up their efforts with China to make a lot of money. So it’s no surprise that Biden signed an Executive Order banning the term ‘China virus’:

INSANE: Joe Biden Signs Executive Order Banning the Term "China Virus" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Joe Biden signed an executive order today that banned the term “China virus.” It’s not clear how this will help with the pandemic.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

It’s also no surprise Biden’s Secretary of State was connected with the Bidens in the Ukraine and China:

Biden's Pick for Secretary of State, Tony Blinken, Is Connected to Biden Family in Their Shady Deals with China and Ukraine | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Biden’s pick for Secretary of State is connected with the Bidens in both China and Ukraine. He’s the best man for the job.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Of course this wasn’t the only interaction between the Biden’s and China:

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Evidence China Was Colluding with the Bidens and Providing Information on How to Defeat President Trump in the 2020 Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The Biden gang’s relationship with the CCP included colluding with the CCP on a strategy to beat President Trump in the 2020 election.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

So it really comes as no surprise that Biden’s pick for CIA Director has strong ties with China:

William J. Burns, who is President Joe Biden’s nominee for director of the CIA, is president of a think tank that has received up to $2 million from a Chinese businessman as well as from a think tank with close ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

As president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Burns also invited nearly a dozen congressional staffers to attend a junket to China, where they met with a communist party operative and a president of a Chinese front group.

It’s also no surprise that Biden is getting rid of President Trump’s actions that require universities to disclose any programs with the Confucius Institutes:

The Biden administration quietly tossed a proposed rule that would have required U.S. universities and K-12 schools with foreign exchange programs to disclose any financial ties or other connections to Chinese state-run Confucius Institutes.

The decision was met with swift backlash from Republicans, who, along with the FBI, State Department, and Education Department during the Trump administration, expressed concern about the potential for Chinese influence operations inside the United States with Confucius Institutes and Confucius Classrooms. Democrats, so far, have yet to react to the change.

Former President Donald Trump’s administration made the proposal, “Establishing Requirement for Student and Exchange Visitor Program Certified Schools to Disclose Agreements with Confucius Institutes and Classrooms,” on New Year’s Eve. But before the rule made its way to the Federal Register or went into effect, the Biden administration withdrew it on Jan. 26, less than a week after Inauguration Day. “ICE can confirm that the rule was withdrawn on Jan 26. ICE does not speculate about future pre-decisional proposed rules or policies,” a spokesperson for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement told the Washington Examiner on Tuesday.

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs website also shows its status as withdrawn.

With the election being stolen and reports China was involved, and with the evil and dishonest media and truth censoring Big Tech, it looks like China is already here. The Biden legacy.

All of China Joe's Actions to Date With China - Help China and Hurt America | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Day after day Joe Biden is doing more and more to support China. In fact, he has done more to help China than help the United States.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Estigal]

Biden Administration Considering Whether to Impose Domestic Travel Restrictions, Including on Florida – Gov. DeSantis Responds​

The Biden Administration is retaliating against the state of Florida after Governor DeSantis has encouraged Floridians to get back to work so they can live their normal lives.

Governor DeSantis recently declared that everyone should get back to work and make “common sense” decisions regarding their health amid the Covid pandemic.

Hair salons, restaurants and schools are open in Florida so the Biden Administration is considering whether to impose domestic travel restrictions on the Sunshine State like it’s 1935 Berlin.

Covid cases are actually declining in Florida so Biden and his stenographers in the media are afraid that DeSantis is exposing the lie that lockdowns slow the spread of the China virus.

News Observer reported:

The Biden administration is considering whether to impose domestic travel restrictions, including on Florida, fearful that coronavirus mutations are threatening to reverse hard-fought progress on the pandemic.

Outbreaks of the new variants — including a highly contagious one first identified in the United Kingdom, as well as others from South Africa and Brazil that scientists worry can evade existing vaccines — have lent urgency to a review of potential travel restrictions within the United States, one federal official said.

“There are active conversations about what could help mitigate spread here, but we have to follow the data and what’s going to work. We did this with South Africa, we did this with Brazil, because we got clear guidance,” one White House official said.

“But we’re having conversations about anything that would help mitigate spread,” the official said, referring to discussions about new travel restrictions that could target the spread of the U.K. mutation in Florida.

Governor DeSantis responded:

Biden Administration Considering Whether to Impose Domestic Travel Restrictions, Including on Florida - Gov. DeSantis Responds | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

The Biden Administration is retaliating against the state of Florida after Governor DeSantis has encouraged Floridians to get back to work so they can live their normal lives.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Estigal]

 

[Estigal]