Traducción al inglés de la realidad
Reality
INTRODUCTION
At what point of technological development are we really? This type of questions are crossed out by many people as "conspiracies", that is to say, they have been stigmatized, but the problem is those people who deal with these issues in an incoherent way and not those who, using logic, can reach a series of conclusions. And it is that, in spite of the lack of evidence several consequences can be deduced that could bring with it an ultra advanced future (or present) scientifically ultraadvanced. Contemporary theorists attach great importance to the scope of symbols in our society: representations of things are increasingly fused in the popular imaginary giving rise to a world called hyperrealist, where fiction and reality are increasingly assembled. Ce n'est pas un pipe remembered Magritte in his famous illustration. Exposure to mass culture has been the cause of this new social mental configuración But what will happen when progress is made in the creation of cyborgs? To what extent can these symbols really be confused with reality? For example, the projection of images into our minds can be a useful tool, but it can also be an intrusion, which advertising agencies would know how to exploit very well. In this type of world there would be several key components: 1. Telepathy: ability to send messages directly to our brain from a distance and decodificar our thoughts. 2. Telekinesis: ability to move our body through the stimulation of certain brain areas and produce sensations in it. 3. Mind control: the ability to create impulses in a person in such a way that they end up behaving against their initial will. 4. Eternity: because if the human is capable of decode the brain and its ideas would also be able to keep it computerized and thus approach eternal life. "Reality" is a political treatise that tries to expose the way in which the world should tend in case these discoveries occur. The utmost seriousness implies, as we shall see, controlling all humanity and masterfully shielding their brains in such a way that this type of discoveries do not suppose a chaos that can derive in an eternal infierno. All this, done by a Great Computer, capable of identify and measure both ideas (relationships of units of information) and sensations, among other variables.
The possibility of the existence of mental control, telepathy and telekinesis exists. Total control of humanity is inevitable if the possibility of the creation of The Well of Maximum Pain is to be avoided. The sensations can be positive, negative or neutral. The level of fun by interaction is measured in divertivolts. These sensations can be both psychological and physical. Scale of sensations
HEROIN--------------------------------NEUTHER----------------------------------------EXTREME PAIN
But what is the Well of Maximum Pain? There is the possibility that a person or group of people exert extreme and eternal pain to another person or group of people. For this reason, maximum SERIOUSNESS demands that this possibility be shielded. It is not very realistic to believe in the possibility of belonging to the Elite of Evil because the world population is high enough to make it highly unlikely to be part of this group. This is an example taken to the extreme of dystopia to which we can lead a misuse of these tools, but there are more ways of using these technologies that we do not either benefit as a society. To give just a few examples:
● The opposite of the MAXIMUM PAIN WELL, that is, a world in which we would all be constantly happy. A constant injection of the soma of which Aldoux Huxley spoke in A Happy World and which would eliminate all kinds of drama in our lives. This would not only dehumanize us but would be very useful for the elites in creating a slave society free of revolts.
● A world in which we were all robotized, acting by mind control and telekinesis thus losing our WILL as servants of the most powerful.
● A world where, although we could all live eternally (or come close to it), only the privilege was reserved for a few. Or the rebels were threatened with death.
THE GREAT COMPUTER
All the above-mentioned dystopias, and anyone the reader can imagine, are possible. Discoveries in neuroscience and nanotechnology, among others, could give rise to such realities without the citizen even realizing it. The only way to avoid it would be to control all beings through those same tools, in other words, by reading their minds and avoiding, preventing, that that would be possible.
Confiar is not an option, history has shown us that villains exist. And the more power a villain is given, the more he is going to enjoy it, the more he is going to feed his sadism and the more he is going to harm us all. In addition, as has already been mentioned, the utmost seriousness demands that this possibility be shielded, in the same way that a doctor must disinfect his utensils, society must be aware that its operation must be carried out in an aseptic environment, free from risks that could harm our freedom as human beings. The question is, who should see to it that this does not happen? That is where THE GREAT COMPUTER comes into play: an intelligence artificial highly sophisticated to which we will all be brain-connected and which will be governed by two basic precepts:
● Minimal interference
● Preventive actions of violent acts
Freedom is a complex concept that define our dictionary as the "faculty that man has to act in one way or another, and not to act, so he is responsible for his acts". In its second sense, refiere refers to the "state or condition of those who are not slaves". In democracies, or if we are something more realistic, plutocracies, in which we currently live, people's freedom is diminished by different causes, among which stand out the need (justified or imposed) for security and the precariousness of work or directly absence of work, for which many people could be considered slaves, or something worse, since the former slaves had a roof over their heads and food and it happens that in many cases, even with work, people cannot dispose of those basics in a secure manner. Any man, just because he exists, has the right to aspire to maximum freedom and for this he needs a non-authoritarian environment in which he can develop and carry out his projects. In order to do this, THE GREAT COMPUTER must be able to prevent both violent events of an explicit nature, as well as those of a psychic nature, which we will call harassment. All these actions will be prevented in the event that there is no consent for them.
PREVENTIVE ACTIONS ON EXPLICIT VIOLENCE
Explicit violence can be carried out against:
● One subject
● Several subjects
● The environment
Can be violations, kidnappings, beatings, killings, fires, nuclear explosions ... ie anything that compromises the integrity of people or the environment. This does not mean that with the simple fact that, for example, a woman fantasizes about poisoning her husband, THE GREAT COMPUTER would take action. Instead, through mental control, she would prevent that poison from being ingested, for example, by immobilizing the woman when she goes to deposit it in the food. In the same way he would act, for example, if a man is in the forest with a shotgun and finds another man and tries to shoot him. His finger would be immobilized and he would be unable to pull the trigger, and so on with all the violent actions carried out without the victim's consent. Could weapons of mass destruction be manufactured? We must bear in mind that we aspire to maximum freedom, so, yes, we could, but not on our planet, if not in another one that meets the appropriate conditions, being impossible to transport it to other places.
PREVENTIVE ACTIONS ON HARASSMENT SOCIAL INTERACTION
Social interaction (subject to subject) consists of the exchange of information. It works with the classic scheme:
E-----------M-------------R
E= Sender M= Message R= Qualitative Receiver mind, messages can be: Truth: seeks understanding of an idea Lies: seeks deception about an idea Information
units can be wrong decodified or wrong codified, Media messages are not about social interaction, but are unidirectional messages to which no instant response can be given. There is therefore in most cases no exchange of information if not simply an offer of information.
TYPES OF SOCIAL SUBJECTS ÜBERMENSCH: Their messages contain: TRUTH + INTENTION OF FUN (OR REST OF FUCK) Try to UNDERSTAND and/or EXPLAIN IDEAS
INFRAMENSCH
If a social subject inframensch intends final to perform an action übermensch may ultimately be a übermensch and vice versa. The result depends on the total amount of divertivolt that is intended to be offered. It is classified as follows: Sincere: Their messages contain: TRUTH + INTENTION OF FUCK (OR REST OF FUN) Try to UNDERSTAND and/or EXPLAIN IDEAS Not sincere: A) FUN Their messages contain: LIE + INTENTION OF FUN WITH THE LIE (O REST DE FUCK WITH THE LIE) Try to OBEY and/or IMPOSE IDEAS.
8. B) NOT FUN Their messages contain: LIE + FUCK INTENTION (OR REST OF FUN) Attempt to OBEY and/or IMPOSE IDEAS You should not fall into the error of cataloguing people according to the types of social subjects, because they are not something that you are, but that you are being. In addition, an inframench response to an inframench message is considered ubermench as long as the fuck units do not exceed twice the fuck units of the initial message.
KARMA
The consent of a social interaction is a message that is translated into words that everyone knows YES or NO. It is not necessary to pronounce these words since consent can be implied or exercised by coercion so what really counts is the will of the person, which is what has to know how to evaluate THE GREAT COMPUTER. In the social interaction or in the offering of information there must always be consent. If it is not HARASSMENT. And there remains karma as long as there is no objective reward final, and therefore the more you repeat the worse karma you will have (and the actions can return without losing karma on the part of the affected person). Always with respect to a specific person or group and not others that have nothing to do with the matter, as is obvious. In order to measure karma, the number of divertivolts involved in each action must be taken into account. The result depends on the amount of divertivolts compared to the fucking units. Both the lie and the fuck remain karma and must be compensated with a higher übermensch action to balance the karma.
The important thing is the intention and not the result of the interaction because: ID + ID + ID + nID = + probability of amusement IJ + IJ+ IJ+ nIJ= + probability of fuck1
There may also be the possibility that there is no consent but the knowledge of the highest probability of understanding final, that is, a RECOMPENSE that respects at the highest level the desires of each person.
1 A fuck unit is equivalent to a negative divertivolt unit.
POLITICAL SYSTEM: THE BASIC WORLD AND THE RECREATED WORLDS
The contemporary world is currently governed by States. Those who control the States are in turn subordinated to the economic elites. Whether one lives in an open-faced dictatorship or in a democracy, we are all subject to the networks of capitalism, which also controls the media, that is, the perception of the social reality of the millions of people who inhabit the planet. Before a citizen inserts his vote in the ballot box, the brain of that citizen has perceived through his education (the educational programs of the State) and the media a series of messages that have conditioned that vote. In addition, before a political party has social relevance, this party has had to receive financiación and media repercussion, that is to say, it has had to have obtained the approval of the economic elites. It is, therefore, a utopian idea to believe that we are represented by a true government of the people. The only sensible option for the human being to decide on matters that really concern him would be the elimination of that state, the creation of a liquid democracy in which everyone had decision-making power and not just a few "representatives", bearing in mind that authority by knowledge prevails in technical matters over authority just for being a person. NOT EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE THE SAME POWER OF DECISION IN ALL MATTERS. In other words, a carpenter is not going to tell a quantum physicist whether to build a particle accelerator in the same way that quantum physicist is not going to tell a carpenter whether or not to put three or four legs on a chair. A world ruled by the GREAT COMPUTER would also be meaningless if we continue conforming a world with physical frontiers. That is, the scope of THE GREAT COMPUTER should be global. The presence of States exists historically because of the presence of wars and criminality. That is, because of the violence between people. This is also the most flaco point of libertarian theorists, who in many cases advocate the creation of popular juries to resolve such issues, which would remain a tyranny, a dictatorship of the people, an issue that as we have seen can be resolved with much more preventive methods eficientes, if the development of technologies is done by the service of the people and not by the service of a few. But what happens if we eliminate all kinds of explicit violence and harassment? Can we talk about full freedom? In order for those who want to create wars, kill or be killed, feel the adrenaline of violence in its pure state, to delimit a world recreated with itso wn rules and exceptions, differentiated from the base world in which everyone has the right to live together and in which such aggressions to human integrity would be eliminated. In this way, the world in general would cease to be governed by States with laws imposed on their citizens by the mere fact of having been born or immigrated there, and would become a system in which each inhabitant or tourist of a State would decide with which laws he or she wants the vital period in which he or she finds himself or herself to pass. That is, if you choose to stay in Hobbiton or prefiere live adventures traveling to Mordor. In the basic world there must be a tendency for robots to perform all the tasks that satisfy our needs, such as food, as well as to cure us of diseases by telekinesis or nanotechnology. The reason why this should be so is that there is the possibility that we achieve a place where no one works out of obligation, doing the opposite is a clear case of SOCIAL HARASSMENT.
Reality
INTRODUCTION
At what point of technological development are we really? This type of questions are crossed out by many people as "conspiracies", that is to say, they have been stigmatized, but the problem is those people who deal with these issues in an incoherent way and not those who, using logic, can reach a series of conclusions. And it is that, in spite of the lack of evidence several consequences can be deduced that could bring with it an ultra advanced future (or present) scientifically ultraadvanced. Contemporary theorists attach great importance to the scope of symbols in our society: representations of things are increasingly fused in the popular imaginary giving rise to a world called hyperrealist, where fiction and reality are increasingly assembled. Ce n'est pas un pipe remembered Magritte in his famous illustration. Exposure to mass culture has been the cause of this new social mental configuración But what will happen when progress is made in the creation of cyborgs? To what extent can these symbols really be confused with reality? For example, the projection of images into our minds can be a useful tool, but it can also be an intrusion, which advertising agencies would know how to exploit very well. In this type of world there would be several key components: 1. Telepathy: ability to send messages directly to our brain from a distance and decodificar our thoughts. 2. Telekinesis: ability to move our body through the stimulation of certain brain areas and produce sensations in it. 3. Mind control: the ability to create impulses in a person in such a way that they end up behaving against their initial will. 4. Eternity: because if the human is capable of decode the brain and its ideas would also be able to keep it computerized and thus approach eternal life. "Reality" is a political treatise that tries to expose the way in which the world should tend in case these discoveries occur. The utmost seriousness implies, as we shall see, controlling all humanity and masterfully shielding their brains in such a way that this type of discoveries do not suppose a chaos that can derive in an eternal infierno. All this, done by a Great Computer, capable of identify and measure both ideas (relationships of units of information) and sensations, among other variables.
The possibility of the existence of mental control, telepathy and telekinesis exists. Total control of humanity is inevitable if the possibility of the creation of The Well of Maximum Pain is to be avoided. The sensations can be positive, negative or neutral. The level of fun by interaction is measured in divertivolts. These sensations can be both psychological and physical. Scale of sensations
HEROIN--------------------------------NEUTHER----------------------------------------EXTREME PAIN
But what is the Well of Maximum Pain? There is the possibility that a person or group of people exert extreme and eternal pain to another person or group of people. For this reason, maximum SERIOUSNESS demands that this possibility be shielded. It is not very realistic to believe in the possibility of belonging to the Elite of Evil because the world population is high enough to make it highly unlikely to be part of this group. This is an example taken to the extreme of dystopia to which we can lead a misuse of these tools, but there are more ways of using these technologies that we do not either benefit as a society. To give just a few examples:
● The opposite of the MAXIMUM PAIN WELL, that is, a world in which we would all be constantly happy. A constant injection of the soma of which Aldoux Huxley spoke in A Happy World and which would eliminate all kinds of drama in our lives. This would not only dehumanize us but would be very useful for the elites in creating a slave society free of revolts.
● A world in which we were all robotized, acting by mind control and telekinesis thus losing our WILL as servants of the most powerful.
● A world where, although we could all live eternally (or come close to it), only the privilege was reserved for a few. Or the rebels were threatened with death.
THE GREAT COMPUTER
All the above-mentioned dystopias, and anyone the reader can imagine, are possible. Discoveries in neuroscience and nanotechnology, among others, could give rise to such realities without the citizen even realizing it. The only way to avoid it would be to control all beings through those same tools, in other words, by reading their minds and avoiding, preventing, that that would be possible.
Confiar is not an option, history has shown us that villains exist. And the more power a villain is given, the more he is going to enjoy it, the more he is going to feed his sadism and the more he is going to harm us all. In addition, as has already been mentioned, the utmost seriousness demands that this possibility be shielded, in the same way that a doctor must disinfect his utensils, society must be aware that its operation must be carried out in an aseptic environment, free from risks that could harm our freedom as human beings. The question is, who should see to it that this does not happen? That is where THE GREAT COMPUTER comes into play: an intelligence artificial highly sophisticated to which we will all be brain-connected and which will be governed by two basic precepts:
● Minimal interference
● Preventive actions of violent acts
Freedom is a complex concept that define our dictionary as the "faculty that man has to act in one way or another, and not to act, so he is responsible for his acts". In its second sense, refiere refers to the "state or condition of those who are not slaves". In democracies, or if we are something more realistic, plutocracies, in which we currently live, people's freedom is diminished by different causes, among which stand out the need (justified or imposed) for security and the precariousness of work or directly absence of work, for which many people could be considered slaves, or something worse, since the former slaves had a roof over their heads and food and it happens that in many cases, even with work, people cannot dispose of those basics in a secure manner. Any man, just because he exists, has the right to aspire to maximum freedom and for this he needs a non-authoritarian environment in which he can develop and carry out his projects. In order to do this, THE GREAT COMPUTER must be able to prevent both violent events of an explicit nature, as well as those of a psychic nature, which we will call harassment. All these actions will be prevented in the event that there is no consent for them.
PREVENTIVE ACTIONS ON EXPLICIT VIOLENCE
Explicit violence can be carried out against:
● One subject
● Several subjects
● The environment
Can be violations, kidnappings, beatings, killings, fires, nuclear explosions ... ie anything that compromises the integrity of people or the environment. This does not mean that with the simple fact that, for example, a woman fantasizes about poisoning her husband, THE GREAT COMPUTER would take action. Instead, through mental control, she would prevent that poison from being ingested, for example, by immobilizing the woman when she goes to deposit it in the food. In the same way he would act, for example, if a man is in the forest with a shotgun and finds another man and tries to shoot him. His finger would be immobilized and he would be unable to pull the trigger, and so on with all the violent actions carried out without the victim's consent. Could weapons of mass destruction be manufactured? We must bear in mind that we aspire to maximum freedom, so, yes, we could, but not on our planet, if not in another one that meets the appropriate conditions, being impossible to transport it to other places.
PREVENTIVE ACTIONS ON HARASSMENT SOCIAL INTERACTION
Social interaction (subject to subject) consists of the exchange of information. It works with the classic scheme:
E-----------M-------------R
E= Sender M= Message R= Qualitative Receiver mind, messages can be: Truth: seeks understanding of an idea Lies: seeks deception about an idea Information
units can be wrong decodified or wrong codified, Media messages are not about social interaction, but are unidirectional messages to which no instant response can be given. There is therefore in most cases no exchange of information if not simply an offer of information.
TYPES OF SOCIAL SUBJECTS ÜBERMENSCH: Their messages contain: TRUTH + INTENTION OF FUN (OR REST OF FUCK) Try to UNDERSTAND and/or EXPLAIN IDEAS
INFRAMENSCH
If a social subject inframensch intends final to perform an action übermensch may ultimately be a übermensch and vice versa. The result depends on the total amount of divertivolt that is intended to be offered. It is classified as follows: Sincere: Their messages contain: TRUTH + INTENTION OF FUCK (OR REST OF FUN) Try to UNDERSTAND and/or EXPLAIN IDEAS Not sincere: A) FUN Their messages contain: LIE + INTENTION OF FUN WITH THE LIE (O REST DE FUCK WITH THE LIE) Try to OBEY and/or IMPOSE IDEAS.
8. B) NOT FUN Their messages contain: LIE + FUCK INTENTION (OR REST OF FUN) Attempt to OBEY and/or IMPOSE IDEAS You should not fall into the error of cataloguing people according to the types of social subjects, because they are not something that you are, but that you are being. In addition, an inframench response to an inframench message is considered ubermench as long as the fuck units do not exceed twice the fuck units of the initial message.
KARMA
The consent of a social interaction is a message that is translated into words that everyone knows YES or NO. It is not necessary to pronounce these words since consent can be implied or exercised by coercion so what really counts is the will of the person, which is what has to know how to evaluate THE GREAT COMPUTER. In the social interaction or in the offering of information there must always be consent. If it is not HARASSMENT. And there remains karma as long as there is no objective reward final, and therefore the more you repeat the worse karma you will have (and the actions can return without losing karma on the part of the affected person). Always with respect to a specific person or group and not others that have nothing to do with the matter, as is obvious. In order to measure karma, the number of divertivolts involved in each action must be taken into account. The result depends on the amount of divertivolts compared to the fucking units. Both the lie and the fuck remain karma and must be compensated with a higher übermensch action to balance the karma.
The important thing is the intention and not the result of the interaction because: ID + ID + ID + nID = + probability of amusement IJ + IJ+ IJ+ nIJ= + probability of fuck1
There may also be the possibility that there is no consent but the knowledge of the highest probability of understanding final, that is, a RECOMPENSE that respects at the highest level the desires of each person.
1 A fuck unit is equivalent to a negative divertivolt unit.
POLITICAL SYSTEM: THE BASIC WORLD AND THE RECREATED WORLDS
The contemporary world is currently governed by States. Those who control the States are in turn subordinated to the economic elites. Whether one lives in an open-faced dictatorship or in a democracy, we are all subject to the networks of capitalism, which also controls the media, that is, the perception of the social reality of the millions of people who inhabit the planet. Before a citizen inserts his vote in the ballot box, the brain of that citizen has perceived through his education (the educational programs of the State) and the media a series of messages that have conditioned that vote. In addition, before a political party has social relevance, this party has had to receive financiación and media repercussion, that is to say, it has had to have obtained the approval of the economic elites. It is, therefore, a utopian idea to believe that we are represented by a true government of the people. The only sensible option for the human being to decide on matters that really concern him would be the elimination of that state, the creation of a liquid democracy in which everyone had decision-making power and not just a few "representatives", bearing in mind that authority by knowledge prevails in technical matters over authority just for being a person. NOT EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE THE SAME POWER OF DECISION IN ALL MATTERS. In other words, a carpenter is not going to tell a quantum physicist whether to build a particle accelerator in the same way that quantum physicist is not going to tell a carpenter whether or not to put three or four legs on a chair. A world ruled by the GREAT COMPUTER would also be meaningless if we continue conforming a world with physical frontiers. That is, the scope of THE GREAT COMPUTER should be global. The presence of States exists historically because of the presence of wars and criminality. That is, because of the violence between people. This is also the most flaco point of libertarian theorists, who in many cases advocate the creation of popular juries to resolve such issues, which would remain a tyranny, a dictatorship of the people, an issue that as we have seen can be resolved with much more preventive methods eficientes, if the development of technologies is done by the service of the people and not by the service of a few. But what happens if we eliminate all kinds of explicit violence and harassment? Can we talk about full freedom? In order for those who want to create wars, kill or be killed, feel the adrenaline of violence in its pure state, to delimit a world recreated with itso wn rules and exceptions, differentiated from the base world in which everyone has the right to live together and in which such aggressions to human integrity would be eliminated. In this way, the world in general would cease to be governed by States with laws imposed on their citizens by the mere fact of having been born or immigrated there, and would become a system in which each inhabitant or tourist of a State would decide with which laws he or she wants the vital period in which he or she finds himself or herself to pass. That is, if you choose to stay in Hobbiton or prefiere live adventures traveling to Mordor. In the basic world there must be a tendency for robots to perform all the tasks that satisfy our needs, such as food, as well as to cure us of diseases by telekinesis or nanotechnology. The reason why this should be so is that there is the possibility that we achieve a place where no one works out of obligation, doing the opposite is a clear case of SOCIAL HARASSMENT.
La ha hecho un traductor que no es Google pero he tenido que cambiar algunas cosas.
Ya tiene más de 2.000 visitas en slideshare. Pero lo importante es que lo visite la persona adecuada.
Wow ya lleva casi 3.000 visitas. Si lo tradujera bien al inglés lo subiría a reddit o a 4chan :frown:
FOFOGOLDO
PRV
fofogordo se trae algo entre manos, lo han vuelto a banear de erepublik , va haciendo spam por foros y el pozo infecto..
FOFOGOLDO
PRV
que os cuente , o contad porque ha desaparecido misteriosamente soujin la loca anoréxica la loca foca y djfeo..
FOFOGOLDO
PRV
FOFOGOLDO
PRV
esto huele raro muy raro, ya no están por allí han borrado pruebas yo las tengo archivadas.. son cuentas a sueldo del SSistema...
