Elecciones generales Estados Unidos 2020: Donald Trump vs Joe Biden

Nolte: CNN’s Jake Tapper Tells Trump Staffers Concede or Get Blacklisted​

CNN’s Jake Tapper joined the growing list of media elites and Democrats (but I repeat myself) calling for Trump staffers to be blacklisted.

Tapper is using a blacklist threat to try and convince Trump staffers to stop contesting the disputed 2020 election. He’s not even hiding it.

“I truly sympathize with those dealing with losing — it’s not easy,” the far-left CNNLOL anchor tweeted Monday, adding, “but at a certain point one has to think not only about what’s best for the nation (peaceful transfer of power) but how any future employers might see your character defined during adversity.”

Joseph McCarthy couldn’t have said it better.

Although the Trump campaign is coming forward with eyewitness accounts in the form of sworn statements alleging widespread vote fraud, although the Trump campaign is legally entitled to recounts in a number of swing states, the venal Tapper is still threatening them — telling them if they don’t give up their legal rights to legally contest a whisker-close election, they deserve to be blacklisted.

In other words, Gee, that’s a nice career you got there. Be a shame if anything happened to it.

This, obviously, is not the first time the disgraced anchor has engaged in McCarthyism and blacklisting.

Without proof, Tapper spent three years falsely accusing President Trump and his campaign staff of colluding with the Russians. Tapper did this despite the fact he knew the documents alleging collusion were bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. Worse still, Tapper almost certainly colluded with disgraced bureaucrats, such as former FBI Director James Comey, to make Clinton’s phony Russia dossier public…

All of Tapper’s red-baiting is right out the McCarthyism Handbook.

And now he’s openly threatening Trump staffers that if they do not roll over and concede to his candidate, they will have a hard time making a living in the future.

Tapper appears to be in some sort of narcissistic downward spiral of hate and self-delusion. He’s openly fantasized about the president of the United States being “physically escorted from the building.” He publicly mocked White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany for defending her colleague Stephen Miller with a (misspelled) tweet heckling her with “Bye, Felisha.” (It’s Felicia.)

Back in September, undisputed texts revealed Tapper tried to meddle in a Pennsylvania congressional election by convincing GOP challenger Sean Parnell not to challenge incumbent Democrat Congressman Conor Lamb. We later received credible reports that Tapper basically harassed the Parnell campaign after those texts were released.

Tapper then straight up lied about his meddling, and again got caught. But Tapper and lying go together like water and wet.

Tapper, obviously, is not the first leftist or member of the corporate media seeking to create a blacklist against Trump staffers and supporters. The media are already calling for Trump staffers to be jailed and left-wing outlets like the Washington Post are defending Soviet-style “truth and reconciliation” hearings against Trump staffers and high-profile supporters.

A countless number of Tapper’s confederates on the far-left are calling for literal lists so “polite society” knows who must be banned and shunned.

The big issue, at least for me, is why are the media so eager, why is a guy like Tapper so eager to shut down a contested election?

What is he afraid of?

The media do not even want legal, automatic recounts to go forward.

Tapper is so freaked out (and full of himself) he’s openly embracing McCarthyism like a life preserver.

For the sake of the 70-plus million Americans who voted for him, and the American whistleblowers putting themselves on the line to expose what they say (in sworn statements under penalty of prison) is widespread vote fraud, Trump needs to keep digging and litigating until he is completely out of options.

In the end Trump might not prevail. In the end, there might not even be any widespread vote fraud uncovered…

We don’t know.

But we deserve to know — for the sake of democracy and for the sake of our republic.

And we cannot allow modern-day McCarthyites like Tapper to intimidate us from doing the moral and patriotic thing.

 

Dimite el fiscal de delitos electorales de EE.UU. tras la autorización para investigar el presunto fraude​

El fiscal general de EE.UU., William Barr, ha autorizado este lunes a todos los fiscales federales del Departamento de Justicia a iniciar las investigaciones sobre las acusaciones de las supuestas irregularidades que se habrían cometido durante las pasadas presidenciales, pese a las escasas evidencias de fraude.

Barr ha explicado a través de una carta que tales investigaciones pueden llevarse a cabo siempre y cuando existan «alegaciones claras y aparentemente creíbles» de esas supuestas irregularidades que, «de ser ciertas, podrían potencialmente afectar el resultado» en algún estado en concreto, según cuenta el periódico «USA Today».

Si bien Barr no ha señalado irregularidad alguna en el texto que ha enviado a los fiscales, sí les ha pedido que en caso de iniciar cualquier investigación al respecto, ésta debe llevarse «con la precaución adecuada» y manteniendo «el compromiso absoluto de neutralidad» del Departamento de Justicia.

Primera dimisión​

El director de delitos electorales del Departamento de Justicia de Estados Unidos, Richard Pilger, dimitió este lunes por la noche tras la orden del fiscal general, William Barr, de investigar el supuesto fraude en los comicios presidenciales.

«Habiéndome familiarizado con la nueva norma y sus ramificaciones (...) lamentablemente debo renunciar a mi cargo como director de la División de Crímenes Electorales», anunció Pilger en una comunicación interna filtrada a medios estadounidenses.

Pilger, además, lamentó que la orden de Barr «deroga una norma de 40 años de no interferencia (federal) en investigaciones de fraude electoral durante el periodo anterior al de certificación de las elecciones».

División entre los republicanos​

Sin embargo, Barr ha sido otra de las figuras del entorno republicano que no escatimó durante el periodo electoral en ataques hacia el voto por correo, principal argumento que esgrime el todavía presidente de EE.UU., Donald Trump, y algunos de sus aliados más fieles, para denunciar fraude en los comicios.

Una teoría que no es compartida siquiera por gran parte del Partido Republicano, más allá de unos pocos incondicionales, puesto que no existen argumentos sólidos de que se produjera ese «gran fraude masivo» que Trump salió a denunciar tras publicarse los primeros resultados.

Entre los que apoyan los intentos de Trump por revertir esta situación están dos de sus hijos, Eric y Donald Trump Jr., así como el principal representante republicano en el Senado de Estados Unidos, Mitch McConnell, para quien el todavía inquilino de la Casa Blanca «está en todo su derecho a examinar las acusaciones de irregularidades y sopesar sus opciones legales».

Por lo general, los fiscales solo pueden actuar una vez los resultados finales estén disponibles, una situación que podría tardar todavía varios días, o incluso semanas, pues los estados tienen hasta el 8 de diciembre para hacerlos públicos de manera oficial.

 
dko7DrP.jpg