Elecciones generales Estados Unidos 2020: Donald Trump vs Joe Biden

Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein Introduces Bill to Ban Assault Weapons, High-Capacity Magazines Hours After House Dems Pass Gun Control Bill​

87-year-old Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein (CA) and Congressman David Cicilline (D-RI) on Thursday introduced a bill to ban “assault weapons” and high-capacity magazines just hours after the Democrat-controlled House passed a gun control bill.

The Democrats introduced the Assault Weapons Ban, an updated bill to ban the sale, transfer, manufacture and importation of military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines, like were used in the massacre in Dayton, Ohio where the shooter had a hundred-round magazine attached to an assault rifle. – Feinstein said in her announcement on Thursday.

“It’s been 17 years since the original Assault Weapons Ban expired, and the plague of gun violence continues to grow in this country,” said Senator Feinstein. “To be clear, this bill saves lives. When it was in place from 1994-2004, gun massacres declined by 37 percent compared with the decade before. After the ban expired, the number of massacres rose by 183 percent. We’re now seeing a rise in domestic terrorism, and military-style assault weapons are increasingly becoming the guns of choice for these dangerous groups. I’m hopeful that with the new administration and Democratic control of the Senate, we can finally pass commonsense gun reforms to remove these deadly weapons from our communities.”

“Assault weapons are designed for a single purpose – to kill as many people as possible in as short an amount of time as possible. That’s why they are the weapon of choice for mass shooters and domestic terrorists. They are weapons of war and do not belong in our communities,” said Congressman Cicilline. “Banning these weapons will make our cities and towns safer and more secure and help to reduce gun deaths.”

Earlier Thursday the Democrat-led House passed a gun control bill to expand background checks with a vote of 227-203.

8 Republican lawmakers voted with the Democrats to pass the “Background Checks Act” that prohibits private firearms transfers without having a background check:

Vern Buchanan (FL)
Brian Fitzpatrick (PA)
Maria Salazar (FL)
Andrew Garbarino (NY)
Chris Smith (NJ)
Fred Upton (MI)
Carlos Gimenez (FL)
Adam Kinzinger (IL)

Jared Golden (ME) was the one Democrat who voted against the bill according to a preliminary tally of votes.

It’s no surprise the Democrats are going after the 2nd Amendment after waging war on the 1st Amendment.

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki last month said gun control is a personal priority for Joe Biden.

Psaki’s comments came after Joe Biden called on Congress to pass tougher gun laws on the third anniversary of the Parkland Shooting.

“Today, I am calling on Congress to enact commonsense gun law reforms, including requiring background checks on all gun sales, banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and eliminating immunity for gun manufacturers who knowingly put weapons of war on our streets. We owe it to all those we’ve lost and to all those left behind to grieve to make a change. The time to act is now,” Biden said in a statement.

 

Jen Psaki: ‘We Recognize’ Joe Biden Policy Changes Enticing Children to the Border​

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki admitted President Joe Biden’s decision to reverse former President Donald Trump’s immigration policies was bringing more unaccompanied minors to the country.

Psaki said Biden’s message was for unaccompanied children to “come and be treated with humanity” at the border.

“Some more may have come to our border and there have been a large flow of children cross the border,” she said. “We recognize that, but we made a policy decision because we felt it was the humane approach.”

Psaki said the “vast vast majority” of migrants were turned away at the border, but the path for unaccompanied children remained.

Over 3,700 migrant children are currently in border patrol detention facilities while they wait until officials can transfer them to Health and Human Services facilities before they are released to sponsors within the United States.

“The president is very focused and very in the weeds of the operational details here,” she said.

Psaki again refused to call the flood of children at the border a crisis.

“Our focus here is on getting to the root of the issues and taking actions, and we don’t feel the need to play games with what it’s called,” she said.

She instead described the events at the border as a “vital human challenge.”

Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador described Biden as the “migrant president” after his virtual meeting with the president on March 1.

“They see him as the migrant president, and so many feel they’re going to reach the United States,” he said according to Reuters.

 

MADNESS AT THE BORDER — HUGE LINE of Undocumented Immigrants Filmed Flooding Across the Rio Grande in Texas​

A huge line of immigrants was filmed waiting for smugglers to take them across the Rio Grande and into the US in Texas.
The video was taken on Wednesday morning.
Joe Biden opened the borders and the illegals are FLOODING IN!
At the current rate, over three million illegal immigrants will have entered America by the end of Biden’s first term.





A smuggler can be seen carrying immigrants across the Rio Grande and unloading them calmly, even while being filmed.
Illegal border crossings totaled over 101,500 in February in Joe Biden’s first month in office.

Instead of kids in cages, Joe Biden took the much less suspicious approach of kids in shipping containers.

President Biden is fueling the fire to the border crisis. What he is allowing to happen will lead to the loss of thousands of American jobs and will increase the spread of the coronavirus during a pandemic. Undocumented immigrants are being let into America like it’s Disneyland.

The border crisis was non-existent under Trump, whereas almost two months into Biden’s Administration it is rampant.

Allowing the invasion on U.S. soil should be an impeachable offense.

 

Biden Signs Executive Order to Make Transgender Surgery Free for Military on Taxpayer Dime​

Joe Biden signed an executive order this week that makes transgender surgery free for the military. From now on US taxpayers will pay for the medical procedures and surgery for transgender candidates.

The operation is not cheap and can add up to $200,000 per patient. No doubt, this will drive more trans men and women into the military. It’s not clear how this helps the military. But, whatever.

The Washington Examiner reported:

Taxpayers will now foot the bill for gender reassignment surgery for active military personnel and veterans, with some treatments costing upward of $200,000 under an executive order signed by President Biden.

Tucked inside Biden’s Jan. 25 transgender order, “Enabling All Qualified Americans to Serve Their Country in Uniform,” is a clause that repeals an Obama-era policy that prohibited federally funded reassignment surgery. This was followed up by memos from both Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Veterans Affairs Secretary Denis McDonough specifically stating that surgery is now an added benefit.

“This revised policy will also ensure all medically-necessary transition related care authorized by law is available to all Service members,” Austin wrote.

In a VA email to employees, McDonough echoed: “Perform an assessment of the necessary steps to eliminate the exclusion of ‘gender alteration’ (gender affirmation surgery) in the medical benefits package.”

 

JUST SHOCKING! Joe Biden Delivers Speech on Anniversary of COVID Lockdowns – Only 7,141 Tune In to White House YouTube Page for His First Address​

Joe Biden delivered his very first address as US President on the anniversary of the COVID lockdowns.

Only 7,141 people tuned in to the White House YouTube page for this highly staged event at the time of writing.

Biden lied about President Trump doing nothing to address this threat.
Biden then lied about Asian Americans being harassed during the China virus pandemic.

He forgot to mention the illegal aliens with COVID he is busing across the country.
Joe cares.





 

“Man, That Thing Is Scary!” – Steve Bannon and War Room Shocked at Joe Biden’s Dead, Black Eyes During COVID Address​

ICtixiU.jpg


Steve Bannon and crew discussed Joe Biden’s first address on Thursday night this morning on the War Room.

Bannon was shocked at Joe Biden’s appearance and his dead, black eyes.
What happened to Old Joe?

Steve Bannon: Number one, compare Joe Biden before with those blue Irish eyes and the glint, and last night, man, that thing is scary! What’s with the eyes? Is it the medication?




 

Democrats Block Amendment that Would Require ICE Be Notified if Illegal Immigrant Tries to Buy a Gun — Then Vote to Take Away Gun Rights from Americans​

The Democrat-led House on Thursday passed a gun control bill to expand background checks with a vote of 227-203.

8 Republican lawmakers voted with the Democrats to pass the “Background Checks Act” that prohibits private firearms transfers without having a background check.

The law will make it harder for law-abiding Americans to purchase guns to protect themselves and their families.

Americans bought an estimated 21 million guns last year during the Democrat-led COVID lockdowns and Democrat-promoted Black Lives Matter riots.

These same Democrats blocked legislation that would require ICE to be contacted when illegal aliens applied to buy a gun.





This is an example of Democrat policy in a nutshell.

 

Biden Attacks Wealthy, Hardworking Americans, Says It’s Time that We Build an Economy that “Grows From the Bottom Up”​

78-year-old Joe Biden on Friday mumbled through a 20 minute speech from the Rose Garden on the American Rescue Plan.

The nearly $2 trillion Covid relief bill Joe Biden signed into law this week has nothing to do with Covid.

Joe Biden on Friday falsely claimed that the $1400 stimulus payments are “what he promised.”

Then he attacked wealthy, hardworking Americans.

“We don’t have anything against wealthy people. You got out and make millions of dollars, that’s fine. I have no problem with that. But guess what? You gotta pay your fair share–you gotta pay somethin,'” said Biden.

Biden said we need to build the economy that “grows from the bottom up” as he attacked Trump’s tax cuts.

Because unemployed people, minimum wage workers and welfare recipients create jobs and cause the GDP to grow.

WATCH:




 

SHOCK REPORT! FBI Sends in Armored Vehicle with Turret, 2 Vans, 6 FBI Vehicles, 3 Local Police Vehicles to Arrest Young Father Who Attended Jan. 6 Rally – UNBELIEVABLE INTERVIEW! – Please Help…​

Joshua James was arrested this week and is being charged in connection to the violent events of January 6th in Washington D.C.

Joshua James is an Iraq War veteran. He was wounded in a bomb blast in Iraq. And Joshua is being held by the FBI without bail.

Joshua is the breadwinner in his family. He receives retirement pay from the military. He has three young children including a 3-year-old.

His wife is a commission-based part-time realtor. She tells us she brings in little income.

The FBI lured him out of his home in Alabama by pretending to be a customer needing a pressure washing.

Then an Army armored vehicle with a turret on top, 2 FBI vans, 6 FBI vehicles, 3 local police and sheriff’s vehicles pulled up and ransacked their home.


Audrey James, his wife, was forced to sit outside for 8 hours with her 3-year-old while the FBI searched their home and broke a light fixture.

Joshua James is a war hero, a veteran, a Godly man, a provider, and a business owner. Joshua James DID NOT commit any violent crime. He attended the January 6th speech by President Trump at the Ellipse along with a million other Americans. He volunteered to work security with other members of the Oath Keepers.

The FBI is holding him until trial because he was seen speaking with two other members of the Oath Keepers that day.

How is this legal?

On Friday The Gateway Pundit spoke with Audrey James and she is understandably distraught.

The FBI is going to move Joshua James to Washington DC.

Audrey said they set up a fundraising page.

** You can make a donation here: Click here to Give now to Fighting for Our Veteran by Audrey James.


Here is our testimony from Audrey James.

Joshua, was arrested this week and is being charged in connection to the events of January 6th in D.C.

Bail WAS recommended by the probation office & we were told prosecution would not argue against bail. But, somehow at the last minute prosecution decided to argue against it. My husband was in D.C. that day providing security detail for speakers of the rally that morning. FBI said under oath they do not believe my husband was part of any violence and they have NO proof that he was involved in violence. The main topic of their testimony was the Oath Keepers logo on his hat, the organization who asked him to provide security to the speakers that day. They kept referencing two other individuals who had the same logos on their clothing that day and their aggressive behavior. The public defender asked “Was Mr. James seen with these people exhibiting aggressive behavior?” FBI Response “No he was not.” Public Defender “Well then let’s talk about Mr. James actions instead.”

They said they have cell phone data that places Joshua pinging off a tower that provides service in the area that includes the Capitol. (That doesn’t prove anything other than he was in the radius of that tower which is about a 6 mile range).

Here is the judges reasons for denying bail: While Joshua doesn’t have a criminal background and has strong ties to the community and is not believed to be a flight risk and may not have been violent that day, he continued to have communication with members of Oath Keeps after the 6th which “proves” he has no remorse for the events of that day. And due to the fact he has PTSD from being blown up in Iraq serving his country and doesn’t take medication for his ptsd and owns fire arms, they feel that’s a volatile combination and see no reasonable scenario for granting bail.

We said we would get rid of any weapons and even agree to a medical evaluation to prove he doesn’t need medication. Are those not reasonable scenarios? Especially for a combat veteran, Purple Heart recipient, small business owner who is the sole provider for his wife and 3 kids, who has strong ties to the community and isn’t thought to be a flight risk? He should be able to be home protecting his family while helping prepare for his legal battles. He is unable to work from jail and we have lost over half our income if he can’t work.

My husband has also used his personal time to repeatedly respond to and assist natural disasters rendering help to victims of tragedy, injury and the destructive forces of nature. Even in his own community.

They called our office line pretending to be a customer needing pressure washing to draw him from the house. They arrested him away from the house but then showed up at our home with SWAT and a tank rolled up to my front door. My 3-year-old and I were drawn outside so they could clear the house and raid it. We had to sit outside for almost 8 hours in the public eye while they tore our house apart and broke a light fixture. The only items they confiscated were oath keepers t-shirts, stickers and pamphlets and a can of some type of pepper spray.

They did come back two days later with a warrant for a random cell phone. Since, we are getting harassing and threatening calls to the business line, email and Facebook.

With bail being denied they will transfer him to DC to await trial.

Who knows when that will be! We have no funds for an attorney of this magnitude and are trying to fundraise.
We are hoping to gain enough support and get our story out there to raise funds to help get an attorney to help bring our veteran home on bail.

Their focus on oath keepers and other oath keepers actions (not mt husband’s) proves their agenda. I asked the public defender why they changed their mind and argued bail he replied “there is pressure coming down to detain them.” This is a political witch hunt. If you need me to send you the affidavit I can. I have also requested a copy of the transcript of the hearing.

 

Joe Biden’s Groping, Fondling and Sniffing of Children and Women CAUGHT ON VIDEO Makes Andrew Cuomo Look Like a Novice​

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo held a press conference at 1 PM ET after a seventh accuser stepped forward to accuse him of sexual harassment.

Several Democrat congressional leaders in New York called for his resignation including Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Senator Schumer and Senator Gillibrand.

Cuomo lashed out at his accusers and the cancel culture mob and said he will not step down.

And why should he? What Andrew Cuomo is alleged of doing does not even compare to what Joe Biden was caught doing on camera — over and over again for years!


Cuomo is accused by seven women of acting inappropriately.

Joe Biden is caught on video — IN PUBLIC — groping, fondling and sniffing little children and women.

We’re all supposed to ignore this.




Joe Biden’s groping and sexual deviance is not a secret.
The Secret Service was well aware of his sexual abuse.

But Democrats still need Biden right now so we’re supposed to ignore his history of sexual harassment.
These are not good people.


 

Biden’s Deputies OK Illegals Importing More Children, Teen Workers​

President Joe Biden’s deputies are making it easier for U.S.-based illegal migrants to import and pick up more so-called Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) at government shelters run by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Officials told reporters on Friday they would end a 2018 policy set by President Donald Trump. The Trump policy allowed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to scrutinize the U.S.-based people who offered to sponsor children and teenagers being held at HHS shelters.

“There will not be any immigration enforcement consequences for a family member or a sponsor who comes forward to be united with an unaccompanied child in our care,” one of Biden’s deputies told reporters Friday afternoon.

The proposed fix to the current traffic jam at the border likely will increase the cross-border flow — because it gives the green light to illegal migrants living in the United States to import more of their left-behind children — and to traffic in more teenage workers into child-labor jobs.

In the current crush, many of the children and teenagers are overstaying the 72-hour limit in the bare-bones border facilities. During Trump’s term, such crowding prompted jeering from migration advocates about “kids in cages.” So Biden’s deputies are using the media’s narrative of “kids in cages” as an excuse to remove curbs on the movement of more children and youths into the United States.

Many illegal migrants choose to leave all or some of their children behind in their home country as they sneak across the border or jump through the asylum and Flores border loopholes. The new Biden policy allows the large population of recently arrived migrants to get their children delivered to the border by paid coyotes — and then delivered to their U.S. homes by taxpayer-funded federal agencies.

But the Trump 2018 policy was adopted also because poor foreign parents agreed to let traffickers move their older teenagers into low-wage U.S. jobs until they worked off their smuggling debts — with interest.

A March 11 report by BuzzFeed News suggests that 35 percent of the current youth migrants claim to be 17, and 24 percent claim to be 16.

Biden’s officials insisted in a March 12 statement that “the new agreement does not change safeguards designed to ensure unaccompanied children are unified with properly vetted sponsors who can safely care for them while they await immigration proceedings.”

Outside the DHS, the view is quite different.

“Honestly, I think almost everyone in the system knows that most of the [migrant] teens are coming to work and send money back home,” Maria Woltjen, executive director and founder of the Young Center for Immigrant Children’s Rights, told a ProPublica reporter: “They want to help their parents,” she said in a November 2020 article.

ProPublica cited the case of Garcia, a Guatemalan youth who used the UAC loophole in 2018:

He was 15 and he had debts to pay, starting with the roughly $3,000 he owed for the “coyote” who guided him across Mexico from Guatemala. To finance the trip, his parents had taken out a bank loan, using their house as collateral. If he didn’t repay it, the family could lose its home.



Within a week of arriving, Garcia accompanied his aunt and uncle to the factory where they worked making auto parts. He got hired on a 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. shift, cleaning newly made screws and bolts with an air blow gun. Workers wore safety goggles to protect their eyes from the shards of metal that blew in their faces. It was a dirty job. “I didn’t like it, working with so many oily parts,” he recalled. “And it was dangerous.”

Garcia was not directly employed by the factory. Instead, he got the job through an “oficina,” the word Spanish-speaking immigrants use to describe the dozens of temporary staffing agencies that employ hundreds of thousands of workers in Illinois. In some cases, the [migrant] teens interviewed by ProPublica — all but one of them male — say they don’t even know the name of the staffing agency that employs them; it’s just the place where someone told them they could find work.




In February 2016, the Washington Post‘s editorial board warned officials of labor trafficking into a hidden child-labor economy:

A recently released Senate report confirmed that HHS in 2014 placed at least six children with a ring of human traffickers, who then forced them to work at Trillium egg farm in Ohio for as little as $2 a day. According to a 2015 criminal indictment, the children were subjected to inhumane treatment — forced to work six or seven days a week, 12 hours a day, and the traffickers “repeatedly threatened the victims and their families with physical harm, and even death, if they did not work or surrender their entire paychecks.” The children were housed in trailers with “no bed, no heat, no hot water, no working toilets, and vermin.”

The Trillium trafficking case is symptom of a wider problem with monitoring unaccompanied minors once they enter the United States. The Senate report noted 13 other cases of post-placement trafficking of minors, with 15 more cases indicating signs of possible trafficking. Inexcusable gaps in HHS policies and procedures led to unaccompanied minors being placed with sponsors or relevant adults in a household without background checks.

The [Obama] administration says that it has strengthened its background-check procedures and that adults with serious criminal offenses are now disqualified from becoming sponsors … HHS and the Department of Homeland Security urgently need to establish a clear agreement as to which federal agency is responsible for monitoring the welfare of unaccompanied minors from the time they are placed with a sponsor until the time of their immigration hearings.

A 2016 Washington Post article explained the egg-farm labor trafficking scandal:

[O]ne Guatemalan boy planned to live with his uncle in Virginia. But when the uncle refused to take the boy, he ended up with another sponsor, who forced him to work nearly 12 hours a day to repay a $6,500 smuggling debt, which the sponsor later increased to $10,900, the report said.



One defendant, Aroldo Castillo-Serrano, 33, used associates to file false applications with the government agency tasked with caring for the children, and bring them to Ohio, where he kept them in squalid conditions in a trailer park and forced them to work 12-hour days, at least six days a week, for little pay.

Amid the border crush, pro-migration groups are pushing for even looser rules to help more migrants get into the United States. For example, some advocates want border agencies to allow foreign relatives to escort younger migrants through the border and HHS processes. According to a March 7 report in USAToday:

Other times, a grandparent who has raised the child since birth will take the arduous journey with them and arrive at the U.S. border – only to be separated from the child for weeks or maybe months, [Lisa Koop, associate director of legal services at the National Immigrant Justice Center] said.

“There should be a way legally for the children to be essentially reunified in place with the adult caregiver without having to go through the entire system,” she said.

Many of those demands will likely be approved by Alejandro Mayoras, the pro-migration advocate who is now secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

“The numbers are enormous, and we are working through it, and we have plans that we will be unveiling shortly to bring order to that,” he told Univision anchor Jorge Ramos in a March 12 interview.

Mayorkas admitted some of the young migrants are picked up by traffickers:

What we need to do as a nation is, we need to invest and address the root causes so that parents do not need to send their children alone to leave their countries of origin, to leave their homes, to traverse Mexico, only to get to get to the southern border and to be placed in the hands of traffickers.

But Mayorkas also indicated he believes Americans have no choice but to watch as progressives extract an unending flow of poor migrants for use in Americans’ homeland:

What we are seeing is a pent-up demand for freedom and humanity, because, over the last four years, the border has been closed, our asylum laws have not been honored and our country’s values have not been advanced.



I’m incredibly proud to be in this administration and to serve a president who has made a commitment and lived up to that commitment to restore our nation’s identity as a nation of immigrants and also a nation of laws.

Mayorkas claims the United States is a “Nation of Immigrants.” But more than 85 percent of Americans were born in America. and more than 50 percent favor a sharp reduction in the annual inflow of one million legal immigrants. Only about one-in-eight Americans favor policies to increase migration numbers, such as Mayorkas’s current policy of raising the inflow of Central American migrants through the 2008 Unaccompanied Alien Child back door.

The Trump 2018 policy was crafted when officials recognized many of the sponsors are not in the United States legally and were using coyotes — and the federal agencies — to deliver their Central American children to their addresses throughout the United States.

“We’ve arrested 41 individuals thus far that we’ve identified,” Matthew Albence, acting chief of ICE, said in September 2018. “Close to 80 percent of the individuals that are either sponsors or household members of sponsors are here in the country illegally, and a large chunk of those are criminal aliens,” he added.

Roughly one-third of would-be sponsors backed out during the period when the policy was in effect, according to a pro-migration organization.

However, in 2019, Republican legislators let Democrats impose a legislative ban on the 2018 policy, largely ending the arrest and deportation of illegal migrant sponsors:




 

Biden Border Crisis: South Texas Migrant Facility at 729% of its Legal Capacity, Children Are Going Hungry and Only Showering Once a Week​

Joe Biden’s border crisis is getting worse by the day.

Joe Biden reversed Trump’s “remain in Mexico” policy, promised amnesty, and allowed unaccompanied migrant children into the US which caused a surge of illegal border crossings in the last several weeks.

Psaki still refused to call the border surge a “crisis” even though CNN is now calling the thousands of unaccompanied minors being kept in cages a “crisis.”

The White House also admitted Joe Biden made a policy decision, recognizing it would cause a surge in illegal immigration.

A South Texas migrant facility is now at 729% of its legal capacity and the unaccompanied children are going hungry and only showering once a week.

According to reports, more than 3,500 unaccompanied migrant children and teens are being held in CBP detention centers.

CBS reported:

A “staggering number” of migrant children detained at a Border Patrol facility in south Texas face overcrowded conditions, with some held for as long as seven days, lawyers who interviewed them on Thursday told CBS News.

Neha Desai, a lawyer representing migrant youth in U.S. government custody, said she interviewed children who said they were hungry, as well as minors who only showered once in seven days.

“Some of the boys said that conditions were so overcrowded that they had to take turns sleeping on the floor,” Desai added, citing interviews with nearly a dozen unaccompanied migrant children held at the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) holding facility in Donna, Texas.

On March 2, the Donna complex was holding more than 1,800 people — 729% of its pandemic-era capacity, which is designed for 250 migrants, according to an internal CBP document reviewed by CBS News.

Most of the minors said they had only showered once while in U.S. custody, even though they’d been held for more than five days, according to Desai. Some said they had showered twice.

The Biden White House continues to say there is no “crisis” at the border.

If unaccompanied migrant children were going hungry, sleeping on the floor of border facilities (cages) and only showering once a week during the Trump years, reporters would be lighting their hair on fire and calling for impeachment.

 

Psaki Can’t Answer if Covid-Infected Illegal Aliens Released Into US Cities Actually Quarantine​

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Friday couldn’t answer if illegal aliens who test positive for Covid and are released actually quarantine (hint: they don’t).

Americans who test positive for Covid are forced to quarantine and be tracked and traced by the US government but Covid-infected illegals can roam around without restrictions.

In fact, last summer a Florida couple was arrested for breaking quarantine after being videotaped by a property manager walking their dogs and “going about normal life functions.”

The young Florida couple was arrested and faced second-degree misdemeanor charges.

But illegal aliens are given carte blanche and can freely roam around as they live off of the largesse of the American taxpayer.

When confronted about Covid-infected illegal aliens, and asked if they actually quarantine, Psaki danced around the question.

WATCH:




 

Un tribunal bloquea temporalmente la prohibición impuesta por EE.UU. ligada a la lista negra de Xiaomi​

A finales de enero anunciábamos que Xiaomi había demandado al Gobierno de los Estados Unidos por su inclusión en la lista negra, y este fin de semana se ha dado a conocer que el juez de distrito estadounidense, Rudolph Contreras, se ha puesto del lado de Xiaomi en su demanda que impugnaba la decisión de las autoridades estadounidenses de incluirla en una lista de empresas supuestamente respaldadas por militares chinos.

La administración Trump añadió al fabricante de dispositivos a la lista en virtud de la Ley de Autorización de Defensa Nacional de 1999 en enero. Tras añadirla, automáticamente prohibía a los inversores estadounidenses comprar acciones y valores relacionados con Xiaomi y habría exigido a todos los inversores actuales que vendieran cualquier acción que poseyeran antes del 11 de noviembre. Sin embargo, la medida cautelar que el juez federal ha emitido bloquea temporalmente la prohibición.

En la demanda judicial de Xiaomi, la compañía argumentó que la prohibición de inversión era "ilegal e inconstitucional" y algo que le causaría un "daño irreparable", al tiempo que negaba cualquier conexión con el ejército chino.

Según Bloomberg, Rudolph Contreras estuvo de acuerdo con el fabricante, calificando la prohibición de "arbitraria y caprichosa" en su fallo. También dijo que la decisión de las autoridades privó al fabricante de sus derechos al debido proceso y que es probable que Xiaomi gane una revocación completa.

En un comunicado enviado a Bloomberg, la compañía dijo que continuará su lucha legal para eliminar su designación como una empresa propiedad de los militares chinos, y es que Xiaomi ya es el tercer fabricante de smartphones del mundo detrás de Samsung y Apple.

 

CNN, MSNBC, y Fox News ven una importante caída en el rating tras salida de Trump: análisis​

La salida del presidente Donald Trump de la Casa Blanca se ha correlacionado con una disminución en el rating y en la audiencia de varios programas de noticias por cable, según un análisis.

CNN, MSNBC, y Fox News han tenido disminuciones generales de espectadores, dijo Variety en su análisis, el cual agregó que después del segundo impeachment de Trump, “las audiencias de CNN se han desplomado” y “MSNBC está viendo aproximadamente la mitad de la caída de CNN”, mientras que Fox News se reducen en un solo dígito.

“CNN Tonight with Don Lemon” pareció ver la caída más significativa con un 32.5 por ciento del 30 de noviembre al 5 de marzo, según el análisis. “Anderson Cooper 360” experimentó una disminución similar del 32.2 por ciento, y “Cuomo Prime Time”, presentado por Chris Cuomo, experimentó una disminución general del 28.5 por ciento.

En MSNBC, “All In With Chris Hayes” sufrió una caída del 16.7 por ciento, “Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell” registró una caída del 17.6 por ciento y “Rachel Maddow Show” sufrió una caída del 9.1 por ciento, mostró el análisis.

En Fox News, el programa de Sean Hannity cayó casi un 12 por ciento y “The Ingraham Angle” cayó un 9.2 por ciento, informó Variety. El único que parece haber quedado relativamente ileso es “Tucker Carlson Tonight” de Tucker Carlson en Fox News, que registró una disminución del 4.8 por ciento, según Variety.

“CNN también vio tres de los cuatro programas con las mayores caídas de audiencia entre la demostración clave de 25-54”, señaló el informe, y agregó que “las fuertes caídas en los tres títulos de CNN serán motivo de preocupación”.

Durante su campaña de 2016 y su mandato de cuatro años en el cargo, Trump fue regularmente, y sigue siendo, la principal noticia nocturna. Variety señaló que sin Trump, “no hay una solución fácil” para dichos medios de comunicación.

“La próxima oportunidad para que Trump domine los titulares será si se declara candidato para las elecciones de 2024 en 2023, con más de dos años para ese hito potencial”, según el informe. “Mientras tanto, los canales de izquierda tendrán que depender de que los políticos cometan errores ocasionales y se acostumbren a la caída posterior a Trump”.

Después de dejar el cargo, Trump ha mantenido un perfil relativamente bajo ya que fue destituido por Twitter, Facebook, YouTube y otros sitios web de las Big Tech. Desde entonces, ha emitido principalmente declaraciones y comentarios por correo electrónico y a través de su asesor y portavoz, Jason Miller, mientras que solo pronunció un discurso en la CPAC a fines de febrero.

Por otra parte, la emisora de tendencia conservadora Newsmax dijo que era la segunda red de noticias más vista por los republicanos después de Fox News. La compañía citó una encuesta de Fabrizio, Lee & Associates.

“No hay duda de que la pérdida de Fox entre los votantes republicanos son las ganancias de Newsmax y OANN”, escribieron los encuestadores. “Muchos votantes republicanos que fueron espectadores de Fox afirman que ven Newsmax u OANN al menos una vez a la semana, sin que ninguna de las cadenas de noticias de la competencia se acerquen siquiera”.

 

Casa Blanca planea un bombardeo de relaciones públicas para disipar dudas sobre el paquete COVID-19​

El presidente Joe Biden y altos funcionarios de su administración van a trabajar para convencer a los escépticos de su paquete de ayuda por el COVID-19 de 1.9 billones de dólares.

Está previsto que Biden emprenda una gira “Help is Here” (La ayuda está aquí) por varios lugares para hablar directamente con los estadounidenses y promocionar lo que consideran un proyecto de ley crucial en la lucha contra el COVID-19.

Se prevé que Biden visite el martes el condado de Delaware, Pensilvania para hablar del plan, mientras que el viernes él y la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris visitarán Atlanta, Georgia. Biden también tiene un evento en la Casa Blanca el 15 de marzo para explicar los detalles de cómo se aplicará el plan.

La primera dama, Jill Biden, por su parte, irá a Burlington, Nueva Jersey el lunes, mientras Harris y el segundo caballero, Douglas Emhoff, hablarán con la gente en Las Vegas. La vicepresidenta y su esposo irán a Denver, Colorado, al día siguiente, y Emhoff viajará solo a Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico, el miércoles.

“Durante sus viajes, hablarán de los beneficios del Plan de Rescate Estadounidense para las familias trabajadoras, y se reunirán con la gente en cada una de estas paradas para hablar de cómo el pueblo estadounidense puede beneficiarse de los componentes del paquete en el futuro”, dijo la secretaria de prensa de la Casa Blanca, Jen Psaki, a los periodistas en Washington el jueves.

Biden y los demás harán hincapié en la ampliación del crédito fiscal por hijo, la extensión de la ayuda complementaria por desempleo y los cheques de 1400 dólares que se enviarán a la mayoría de los estadounidenses, entre otras disposiciones. Los pagos directos llegarán a las cuentas bancarias de algunas personas ya este fin de semana.

La gira se produce mientras la Casa Blanca lucha contra las críticas por haber conseguido cero votos republicanos en el Congreso para el paquete de ayuda.

El Congreso lo aprobó mediante un proceso presupuestario que permitió a los demócratas del Senado no necesitar ningún apoyo republicano. Además de la oposición unificada de los republicanos, el congresista Jared Golden (D-Maine) votó en contra, argumentando que muchos de los programas que la financiación apoyaría ya están subvencionados a través de paquetes anteriores.

Biden y la Casa Blanca han señalado las encuestas que mostraban, entre los encuestados, un apoyo bipartidista al nuevo proyecto de ley, pero los legisladores republicanos han cuestionado esa postura.

“Eso es una broma. Quiero decir que las encuestas públicas son tan precisas como la gente que las hace, la metodología que utilizan y todas esas cosas”, dijo el senador Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) a los periodistas en el Capitolio esta semana. Cuando la gente se entere de algunas de las disposiciones del proyecto de ley, como el envío de pagos directos a las personas encarceladas, “se van a indignar”, añadió.

El senador Mike Braun (R-Ind.) dijo que los republicanos podrían apoyar algunas de las disposiciones, como los pagos directos o la financiación para impulsar la administración y distribución de la vacuna COVID-19.

Biden dijo en un discurso en horario de máxima audiencia el jueves que el proyecto de ley permitirá la reapertura de más escuelas, y proyectó que las familias podrán reunirse para hacer comidas al aire libre el 4 de julio si el número de vacunaciones sigue su trayectoria actual.

También describió el paquete como “una pieza histórica de legislación que ofrece una ayuda inmediata a millones de personas” antes de promocionar los pagos directos.

“En las próximas semanas y meses, viajaré, junto con la primera dama, la vicepresidenta, el segundo caballero y los miembros de mi gabinete, para hablarles directamente, para decirles la verdad sobre cómo el Plan de Rescate Estadounidense hace lo necesario en este momento. Y si fracasa en algún [punto], reconoceré que ha fracasado. Pero no lo hará”, dijo.

Ese mismo día, Harris dijo en una mesa redonda en Washington que el paquete de ayuda “sacará de la pobreza a la mitad de los niños estadounidenses que viven en ella”.

El discurso de Biden provocó críticas de muchos republicanos, que señalaron que no dio crédito a la administración del expresidente Donald Trump por iniciar la carrera para desarrollar las vacunas COVID-19. También hubo críticas a su paquete de ayuda.

La presidenta del Comité Nacional Republicano, Ronna McDaniel, haciendo eco de muchos legisladores del GOP, se refirió al proyecto de ley como un “despilfarro disfrazado de ‘ayuda’ por el COVID”, añadiendo en un comunicado: “Biden y los demócratas en el Congreso eligieron aprobar un proyecto de ley partidista en el que solo el 9% del dinero se destina a la lucha contra la pandemia, todo ello mientras siguen ignorando el sufrimiento de las familias estadounidenses que están luchando mientras se quedan sin trabajo y sin escuela”.

Biden voló el viernes a su casa en Delaware, ignorando las preguntas sobre si el gobernador de Nueva York, Andrew Cuomo, debería renunciar, y no tiene actos programados este fin de semana. La vicepresidenta Kamala Harris permanece en Washington pero tampoco tiene ningún acto en su agenda.

 

Foreigners Flooding the Border Claim They’re Coming Because ‘Biden Will Be a Good President for Migrants’​

The people flooding our southern border are telling journalists that they’re doing so because Joe Biden “is going to be a good president for migrants.”

There is now a massive crisis at the border, as thousands of migrants are crossing each day — during a pandemic.

“Biden promised us that everything was going to change,” one of the migrants, Gladys Oneida Pérez Cruz. told The New York Times. “He hasn’t done it yet, but he is going to be a good president for migrants.”

The Times reported that another woman was in tears at the border saying, “Biden promised us!”

The Daily Wire reports that “Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers say that some 100,000 foreigners came to the border in February alone, and after weeks of claiming all is well, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Saturday acknowledged that ‘record numbers’ of foreigners are overwhelming U.S. agencies, prompting the department to call in help from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).”

“The federal government is responding to the arrival of record numbers of individuals, including unaccompanied children, at the southwest border. Since April 2020, the number of encounters at the border has been rising due to ongoing violence, natural disasters, food insecurity, and poverty in the Northern Triangle countries of Central America,” the DHS said. “The federal government is working around the clock to move unaccompanied children from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) care and to place them with a family member or sponsor until their immigration case is adjudicated. The risks posed by the spread of COVID-19 have made this mission all the more difficult.”

 

JUST IN: Feds Are Holding More Than 4,200 Children in Cages, With “Jail-Like Stations Unfit to House Minors”​

em9t2tC.jpg


The Biden administration is now holding over 4,200 kids in “jail-like” stations where they can only bathe once a week and are reportedly not allowed to call their parents.




Amy Goodman at the Socialist forum, Democracy Now, reported on the deteriorating conditions earlier today.